Is free hosting is better?

[365ezone]

no i don't think so ..........
if you have business website or personal website you should use paid hosting go get better
result .........
other wise if you want a personal site to host for free the you should use wordpress.com or blogger.com how are more reliable then these free host........

[sportfultanvi]

Free hosting are meant for no money output. Their service would be really bad..

[365ezone]

yes correct , there services are bad , because they don,t take money for hosting so they can do any thing , like closing of account or adding advertisement to generate revenue ....

[redirection]

i actually find the free hosting's bandwidth great. 150gb is not bad. might try some free next time.
most of them allow addon domains which is great if you need a lot of bandwidth. might try this megabyet.com

[kurosagi]

The only one free hosting i know is co.cc so my knowledge about this thing is limited.
But logically, people will come and buy only to site which look professional in make business. So i recommend you to use paid hosting and domain.

[365ezone]

by the way co.cc don't provide free hosting they provide fee domain name with extension " co.cc"......

[akira07]

Yes, and some domain name is no longer free >.<

[valkerion]

There is a saying: What you pay for is what you receive. That means if you spend no money, a not so good service will be provided. You won't have that quality of a support and your disk space will be restricted, your bandwidth will be restricted, and the only way to have a custom domain is to follow a dot tk or a co.nr service..

[365ezone]

correct.........

[~ServerPoint~]

Yes, and some domain name is no longer free >.<

Which ones? I'm curious.